Can it be repeated? The precedent that supports Laporta's idea of ​​playing the Classic again

The meeting of the past Sunday between the Real Madrid and the FC Barcelona (3-2), further to be an authentic festival of goals, went a marked duel by the controversy because of the questionable performance of the referee César Soto Degree. It is especially remarkable an action in particular: the goal 'ghost' cancelled to Lamine Yamal. Although the diverse takings of the played seem to indicate that it was a totally lawful target, no contabilizó in the marker.

In this sense, Joan Laporta, president of the Barcelona cast, expressed his dissatisfaction by the controversies arisen during the party that prejudiced to the team. It did upsetting in that the club will not remain of arms crossed in front of this unlucky referee's performance and left clear the measures that will take to tackle this controversy. "There was several played debatable, but between all there is one that results paramount and that it can involve a change in the final result of the party. I refer me to the called goal ghost of the Lamine (...). To confirm that it was a legal goal, will go further and no descartamos ask the repetition of the party, as it has occurred in a party of European field by an error of the VAR", expressed.

In this context, is pertinent to do reference to the antecedent to the that the Barcelona mandator does quotation. It treats of the clash between the RSC Anderlecht and the KRC Genk in the Jupiler Pro League, the league of football of Belgium, that took place the past 23 December. The Council of Discipline of the Professional Football of Belgium determined that there was a wrong application of the VAR in a played and ordered the repetition of the meeting, fixing the date for the next 11 May and marking a totally unpublished precedent.

Why it will repeat the clash between the Anderlecht and the Genk?

The played that drove to the repetition of the party was a penalti. Sucedió In the minute 23, when Yira Sor, player of the KRC Genk, converted an annotation when taking advantage of the rebound that left the goalkeeper of the RSC Anderlecht, Kasper Schmeichel, after detaining the maximum penalty executed by Bryan Heynen of the 'Pitufos'. However, the goal was cancelled when considering that Sor ingresó to the area before the allowed, depriving like this to the combined visitor of a so much in favour that, considering the final result of the commitment (2-1), could have meant the tie.

🖥️ Of VAR geeft een penalty aan KRC Genk
❌ Kasper Schmeichel redt vanop elf Put
⚽️ Yira Sor scoort in Of herneming
🙅‍♂️ Of VAR keurt het doelpunt af

Wat was dat allemaal? 😅 #ANDGNK pic.twitter.com/gmanaqvttg

— Elevate Belgium (NL) (@ElevenBeNL) December 23, 2023

Nevertheless, after reviewing the played, discovered that Yari Verschaeren, player of the Anderlecht, also ingresó in advance to the area. According to the rules, in place to cancel the goal, would have to have repeated the launching from the eleven steps, since when players of both teams infringen the rule of invasion, the recommended is to repeat the execution, according to the IFAB (International Football Association Board).

In front of this situation, the Genk felt clearly prejudiced and continued insisting in the repetition of the meeting. After presenting his arguments, finally attained his aim. This situation could be similar for the FC Barcelona, given the injustice of the cancellation of a lawful goal and the sufficient proofs that back this controversial decision.