The darts of Víctor Font to the proposals of Joan Laporta

The precandidato to the presidency of the Barcelona, Victor Font, criticised the proposal of Laporta to solve the debt of the Catalan group, particularly to the broadcast of bonos. Since it considers that it can worsen even more the debt of the club as well as to the model of social property, and quoted it sucedido with the Milan like example.

Like this it said it Font in an interview given to Radius Marks: "it Exists the risk of the model of the property. You know that, in the Milan, Berlusconi sold it to some Chinese owners and like these owners needed and wanted money raised money with an investment fund that calls Elliot Management. And as they could not give back the money to a bottom vulture of these characteristics, as they have remained the property of the club. And now Elliot Management is the owner of the club, of the Milan".

"This is the current risk that has the Barça with 1.300 million debt and with some candidates asking issue bonos, that is more debt and that it would be an attractive product for bottoms like Elliot Management. If this bottom remained a part of the bonos that issue, in this situation, the Barça turns into a Sportive Anonymous Society, that is what it is necessary to avoid as it was", affirmed the leader of "Yes to Futur".

Besides, it loaded against the also ex president of the Barcelona by losses that the club would have registered during his management. "In 2010, with the best team of the history, Laporta closed with 27 million losses, the same radius of net debt-income that have now. It is the president that says that now that will save the situation issuing bonos. Miremoslo Very eh".

It closes rows with Messi

Font, criticised to those that have blamed to Messi by the economic crisis of the club afterwards that his agreement was filtered by The World, by what remembered that the Barcelona would not have grown as it did it of not being by him. "Already we express our opinion the Sunday, is an absolute shame accuse to Messi to ruin to the club, if we are what are today, if we have grown, if we have turned us into a world-wide reference, there is a big culprit that is Leo Messi. That the opponents take advantage of the weakness of the institution and filter the agreement to hurt is inadmissible. We want that this so extraordinary history between Messi and the Barça lengthen and last a lot of years more".

Fault of debates and Eric García

The applicant to direct the Catalan group, loaded so much against Laporta as with Toni Freixa by not wanting to do a public debate. "What less likes me is that it does more than a month that are candidates and have not had any debate. Do tactical or electoral strategy is hurtful for the interests of the Barça. Have to know the teams of each candidature, does not be necessary to remain with the perception of each candidate. We know to the Laporta of the past, but know to the of now, like Freixa. But besides we know the profile of his teams, which experience have, which knowledges. Intuyo That some candidate does not want to debate until the last week and this is a problem for the democracy of the club. I would be doing debates each day", said.

Besides, also it refused the one who do not have fichado to Eric Garcia in January, signing to the cual opuso Laporta since his agreement finishes in six months and like this could ingresar to the club without having to pay him to the City. "We wanted to Eric García, try to do management putting the interests of the club by in front. I ask after me what the others candidates have opposite, because the trainer needed it today to win to the PSG, win the Glass, trace back to the Athletic in the League. If we can it to us allow, are a team of football, no a company. As when it needed to Edgar Davis and the situation also was disastrous, although no as now. I do not understand why they have not wanted to it fichar".