—>
Koeman And the technical body showed  very dissatisfied with the referees in the Classical

BY HIS SANCTION IN FRONT OF THE GRANADA

It SCRAPES it it gives the reason to Koeman: "character" is not an insult

Published:1/05/2021 - 14:34h

Updated:1/05/2021 - 14:34h

Ronald Koeman has considered like unfair the suspension of two parties owing to having referred to the referee like "character", a word that does not have negative connotations as it SCRAPES it

Calendar of FC Barcelona

In addition to loading with a painful defeat of face to the aspirations of the FC Barcelona in LaLiga, the Barcelona picture will see noticeably affected by the absence of Ronald Koeman by two commitments. The reason: have directed to the referee Pedro González Strong with the expression "go character".

In consequence, the Dutch will be absent in the bench for the crashes in front of Valencia and the Athletic of Madrid. After the party, sustained that his comment did not suppose an insult for the referee: "According to the record of the referee have been missing to the respect to the fourth referee and for me is not like this. A lack of respect is to abuse. That it say me which are the words that have used, any of them has been ugly".

In accordance with the Royal Spanish Academy, the term "character" does not collect meanings descalificativas, by what the Barcelona technician would not have incurred in an attack to the person of González Strong, by what the sanction could be based in a bad interpretation of his words.

Koeman, with SCRAPES it to his favour

In accordance with the dictionary of SCRAPES it, "character" has four meanings. The first of them does reference to a "Person of distinction, quality or representation in the public life", whereas the second is more linked to the fiction: "Each one of the real or imaginary beings that appear in a literary work, theatrical or cinematographic".

The third of them would be the nearest to what wanted to say Koeman on the referee of the Barça-Granada: "singular Person that stands out by his peculiar form to be or to act", whereas the last would have a totally distinct meaning to the previous "ecclesiastical Profit compatible with another".

Today highlights