The former Barça vice-president speaks clearly: "What is decided in the box cannot be changed"

Published:2/10/2023 - 11:38h

Updated:2/10/2023 - 11:38h

This Sunday fulfilled six years of that party between the Barça-The Palms in which the Barcelona club finished playing, although from the Managerial Board had decided the contrary by the social situation in the City Condal

Carles Vilarrubí was the institutional vice-president of the FC Barcelona on 1 October 2017, day in which the Barcelona team finish playing against the UD The Palms by decision of the players, in spite of that the managerial board had decided not contesting the party some hours before. Six years afterwards, has ensured that "what decides in the loge can not change in the changing room. East was my message to the president", ensured.

In an interview for 'RAC 1', Vilarrubí, the one who resigned that same day, manifested equally that in the changing room there was not unanimity in that moment, but ensured that "to my costs me imagine other clubs or presidents that can happen them this. In the real world exists a logical hierarchy: The board takes a decision and all the world has to assume it", in reference to the decision to play.

The changing room of that Barça had a too important weight

In spite of his renunciation, equally showed understanding with Bartomeu, explaining that "it is necessary to imagine the pressure to which Bartomeu was subjected. If all were it, he even more and stronger. Of all type. This afternoon the president receives hundreds of calls, to cual more important. It is necessary to understand him", stood out. Also it aimed which was the question that finish to bend the scales, remembering that "as it transmitted us the president the stick and the sanction would be important in case of not playing. It tried transmit to the world a feeling of absolute normality. Cover an image with another. The one of Messi playing was very powerful", resolved.

That moment could be even more delicate for the FC Barcelona

Regarding the players, Vilarrubí affirmed that "also in the changing room there were discordant voices. There was not unanimity, this is evident. I only saw a player. I did not speak with him but it was not necessary. Gerard Hammered. And I am sure that he was not for playing. A sample is that it went dressed of street when it went up to the loge shortly before the party", concluded. Equally it wanted to remember that "a day where are apalizando to the people can not play to ball. If this day had happened him something to a partner, all the Board had not been able to step the country", resolved.