Churches Villanueva explained does years his opinion on the arbitration

For the second time in less than a year, the FC Barcelona has seen prejudiced by the no granting of a legal goal in LaLiga, in both occasions with a balloon that rebasó clearly the line of put, but the Committee of Referees has ensured that there will be sanction for Churches Villanueva and his assistants. The referee of Mestalla has not done statements, although it does some years explained his personal vision on his work.

It was in a talk for 'TEDxGalicia' in which it detailed reason decided to devote to the profession and which is his way to live it. It was with 14 years when it decided to devote to the arbitration, and confessed that after some initial doubts feels a privileged: "we Are marcianos? And if it was mad about us our work? And if it hurt us more than to anybody make a mistake us? I am a privileged in spite of what can think my neighbour".

Then, Churches Villanueva already gave a track on the silence of the referees after the parties, something that has repeated in this occasion. "Only they call us to speak of the errors. Never of the tarpaulins. Therefore we do not do statements", aimed the one of Puentedeume.

"We visit each party 11 kilometres. The same that any midfield player. We see a lot of football to treat to know to the players. It is necessary to look, see and decide . And it is necessary to do it fast. In the football only there is penaltis and went of game the other is an art. In the parties the fundamental is to hit in the important decisions, as in the life", analysed.

Double rasero

Churches Villanueva also thought on the difference of trial in the errors of the footballers and the referee's, signalling that his is a little grateful work: "For me there is not any difference if it fails a referee or a player . But if a player fails, the field is bad or the goalkeeper was hit or had bad luck. Instead to anybody seems him badly if the players deceive to the referees if his team is benefited. In my world, the tarpaulin is ephemeral and the error pendenciero".

What is clear, personal opinions separate, is that his performance in Mestalla has reopened a debate that already would have to be solved but that will advance in the next months. The trencillas need help, and nowadays with the technological assistants, like the VAR, does not understand that a League that boasts to be the best of the world can allow errors so flagrant. It touches reflexionar.