Barcelona and Real Madrid vs PSG, the extremes of the Fair Play selected to finger

The Barcelona does not cease in the research of alternatives that allow him in the first place keep to Messi in the club, second lighten the mass salarial and in third place, avoid a default economic that little mentions by the weight of the term, but that seen the seen, is more than possible. Although no immediate.

While the world accommodates still the hard cushion that the Covid installed in the main piece of furniture of the house, the arks and banking accounts follow presenting a depression tremenda that by vicinity and passion understand in the football, but is not extraneous all the other, from the career by the space until the humblest work of the planet.

In you plough of the licence that allows us speak of the subject, the football has presented determinate variants that allow to confront the situation so much in pro of the profit of the protagonists as also of the institutions, splitting in the simpleza to add two changes more in the games until putting him rules to the fair play.

But in this last, the UEFA seems to have a dilemma or rather, a conflict of interests, because although they use the valid argument to defend the investments that keep alive the football, also do case omiso to the problems that exist inside the other teams and this time, does not treat of a modest recently risen.

Saving the differences, the Mallorca and the Barcelona have exactly the same problem, the money. Raisin in the capital with Real and Athletic, raisin in Portugal with Benfica and Carry, in Holland with Ajax and PSV. It goes us the note quoting clubs so to the grain: it does not happen with determinate teams, these called "of state".

And to bring the clearest example, is the PSG. The staff of the French club no only has on the have lost the league in front of the humble Lille, fall in Champions in front of the Manchester City or have an open conflict with Mbappé, but besides it has a wide margin of movement to the moment to hire.

The recently arrived Achraf, pertinent of the Inter of Milan by almost 70 million euros, well can see like the injection of capital to an asleep market that moved in the free agency, but is slept by a global crisis, the players without agreement have the level that know and the premiums of signing are a train that no all leave to happen.

Part of this money was to stop to the Real Madrid, that still had balance in favour by the sale Hakimi to the Italian team, whereas the valid champion of Series To remained without technician and with utmost difficulty will keep to Lukaku, more by the comfortable that is in the club that by good agreement. To fill the vacancy by right, litigate the arrival of Bellerín, that hardly would brush the 20 million euros.

Sight the tip of the iceberg, submerge us in a club Frenchman that also incorporated to Sergio Bouquets and Wijnaldum, yes, free both, but in addition to the premium of signing explains the wage. The Spanish would win the same that in the Real Madrid to having renewed, something more than 10 net millions by season, but the last leaks indicate that they could be even more than 12.

Achraf Also would have an upper entry to the 12 millions by season and the Dutch that refused to the Barça would surpass the 10 millions by year. To this, add to Neymar, Mbappé, Keylor, Marquinhos, Verratti, Icardi and Gave María, only by atinar to the more mediáticos in a club that all wants to resolve it by dint of money.

In the another footpath, the Barça, that added to the staff to Eric García, Memphis Depay and Sergio Agüero, players that still can not be inscribed by the limit salarial of LaLiga, imposed by Thebes in spite of selling the most expensive rights that remember by a tournament that does not have to Messi, free from 1 July.

The team culé can not inscribe to the new signings neither renew to Messi without before sell an absurd quantity of players, posing the exit free of Umtiti and until of Coutinho, without forgetting that Lenglet, Dembélé and Griezmann could go even in half of his cost, or less, whenever it free the space in the payroll.

It does not seem very "fair" the "play" for the clubs that belong to the partners, that do not have injection foránea without limits and that to base of titles and history, have given to his fanatical joys and solidity with the years. What happened with that to defend to the fan? They were not the promoters of the Superliga the ones of the monopoly and the kidnapping to the football?

And that do not confuse the publishing line of this half because to the Barcelona quotes him with something of property and knowledge, but in the table of the doubts also seats the Real Madrid, that by habit adds stars and grieve fichó to Praises precisely with the space left by Bouquets. The Athletic does not escape of this, that after the goodbye of Thomas did malabares to add to Kondogbia more by limit salarial and money to spend that for being able to choose.

Juventus Already had to do magic with the arrival of Cristiano Ronaldo and neither thought in using masks of compulsory form, without forgetting the failure of the Wigan English and the Kaiserslautern German. Agnelli, that was at the top of the Association of Clubs of Europe (ECA), lost his charge after the announcement of the Superliga and casually, took the witness To the Khelaifi, president of the PSG.

It does not forget that the pandemia is not the only factor that puts in risk the money of the Barcelona, but the football in general suffered the true hit and kidnapping in 2017, when a club with interminable capital decided to pay 222 millions by a player, crediting one of these clauses that were more symbolic that really feasible.

By the way, that also are in diary Pogba, star of the Manchester United, Donnarumma, MVP of the Eurocopa and want to try it with Messi, MVP of the Glass America.

The Superliga, another step at the front

Barcelona, Real Madrid and Juventus follow alive in the fight with the UEFA that no only saw died the dream to take out them of Champions, but besides it is witness almost weekly of a new judicial failure in favour of the teams promoters of the project, rather, of the brave that are still in foot after throwing the pulse.

They are missing a lot of explanations on this tournament, as they also were missing does a few decades on the Glass of Europe or more recently with the Euroliga, but in a stage where the income go to the same for each club participant, the clear benefited of the actuality seem to have armed a plot based in the fear.

Retreats almost immediate, pressures to the remaining and a brutal siege to what follows inside, were not sufficient to delete the first step of the that surely, will be a change in the football to future.