César Soto Degree, a sadly famous name for the barcelonismo, has gone back to be the negative protagonist in a commitment of the FC Barcelona. In this occasion, the Barcelona cast had to lidiar with a series of controversiales decisions of the referee castellanoleonés in the Classical in front of the Real Madrid (3-2) that, beyond all doubt, have showed the most controversial face of the arbitration in LaLiga and, of course, the double vara that can have in determinate actions.
Separating the notorious omission of the annotation 'ghost' of Lamine Yamal, which, valuing diverse takings, sees clearly how the balloon rebasa the line of goal, suits to speak of the penal pitados and the no sanctioned by Soto Degree, a clear sample of his disparity of criteria in this controversial day, awarding a debatable maximum penalty in favour of the cast merengue and omitting other two similar in favour of the Barcelona picture.
Some of the controversial actions that starred Soto Degree
It is necessary to begin commenting about the penal sanctioned on Lucas Vásquez, which later would be turned into goal by Vinicius Junior. In the action that derived in the presumptive infringement committed by Pau Cubarsí on Vásquez, sees clearly how the '33' arrives to the coverage, but detains in the attempt to close the pass to the heart of the area, no with the intention to commit an infringement. However, in the takings observes clearly how Lucas, when seeing that Cubarsí pulls the leg, perhaps with some innocence, looks for the contact to create the fault. It was a trip that Soto Degree did not doubt in sanctioning, but that not even bothered in reviewing in the VAR.
Now, it is necessary to move to the contrary area, to the 31', almost immediately after the goal 'ghost' cancelled, where occurred a surprisingly similar action inside the area of the Real Madrid. Eduardo Camavinga goes to the crossing and makes a swept in front of Lamine Yamal, interfering in his advance and demolishing it later. What did Soto Degree? Absolutely at all, it allowed that the action continued in front of the look perpleja of the effective culés.
Later, regarding the penaltis, the referee Soto Degree also 'ate' another maximum penalty in favour of the FC Barcelona. This occurred in the second half, in the minute 58, when the defender Antonio Rüdiger, when seeing that Fermín López escaped him with a skillful dribbling and would remain hand manually with Lunin, cut his advance with a caderazo, as if it was doing a screen in basketball. This action, because of the difference of contexturas physical, finished with the onubense being demolished. Soto Degree neither valued this action and applied the law of the 'follow-follow', topping again a performance that leaves a lot that wish against the Barça, which is beginning to turn into a negative tendency.