The FC Barcelona went out of the Coliseum Alfonso Pérez with only a point in his have, but with the certainty that the performance of César Soto Degree and his assistants was not the most ideal, being extremely permisivos in front of a Getafe that knew to take advantage of this 'free bar' to play with a physical rigour brushing the extradeportivo. The cast 'azulón' received six yellow cards and a red, in addition to committing 20 faults, that to have effected a less indulgent arbitration, would have been even more numerous.
One of the most stood out actions of the clash was the clear penalti no pitado to Ronald Araújo after a fault committed by Gastón Álvarez. This was due to a presumptive previous hand of Gavi, which did not remain of the all clear and with the conditioning that in this played the palatine was incomodado by Juan Churches.
The Getafe FC 'hit to pleasure'
From the start of the party, the Getafe began to deploy his aggressive game. Frenkie Of Jong was the first victim when receiving a push of Carles Aleñá to the minute 1, just after making a pass. This tendency to receive hits after soltar quickly the balloon was constant during the meeting and the referee César Soto Degree allowed it.
From here, the 'Geta' continued with a series of aggressions with and without balloon, provocations and artimañas for desconectar to the Barça. Although all the players of the square 'azulona' hit enough, the main protagonist in these actions was Damián Suárez. The Uruguayan 'hit to pleasure' and to penalties was admonished to the 82', after committing no less than five faults, which did not receive the corresponding sanction. Even, in the first-half, after several actions against Robert Lewandowski, Of Jong and Alejandro Balde, gave one of the actions more comprometedoras of this duel, as the defender 'charrúa' him propinó a codazo to Ilkay Gündogan to the height of the stomach to the 25', a similar action by which expelled to Raphinha, only that in this there was not not even caution.
César Soto Degree had a criterion dispar to expel to the technicians
The referee also showed a flexible criterion regarding the expulsions of the trainers. Xavi was expelled for going out of his technical area and protest of way ostensible to the fourth referee. Nevertheless, José Bordalás the one who protested of way more effusive and even invaded the terrain of game, was not admonished and could finish the party without problems.
The guinda of the cake was the penalti no pitado to Ronald Araújo at the end of the party. The referee pitó a hand of Gavi in a played previous, but the repetitions showed that it was not clear. Xavi declared that the hand was invented, and although the referee reviewed the VAR several times, could not darse of this. These are only some of the faults that could see in the television transmissions, without explaining those that were not attracted by the cameras.