Vinicius' 'crack' should cause a harsh sanction for the Brazilian

The dispute between Vinicius Jr. And Valencia CF seems not having end. In the controversial party of the past Saturday between the 'ches' and the merengues, that resulted in a tie 2-2 and with a controversial goal cancelled, the fans valencianista present in Mestalla showed once again his dissatisfaction booing to the carioca. The '7' of the whites answered with two annotations and encaró with the public every time that it could, showing his facet more provocadora.

Nevertheless, the action that could carry it to be sanctioned occurred after the duel. In this occasion, the exjugador of the Flamengo did a hard statement in front of the cameras of 'Real Madrid TV', the channel of the team merengue, presumably oriented to the work of the arbitration of the referee Jesús Gil Manzano: "At the end we have not been able to because they have not left us".

Why they would have to sanction to 'Vini Jr.' By these statements?

The option of a sanction for the talentoso extreme left arises when comparing this fact with the case of José Luis Gaya, the one who in the final stretch of the season 2021-22 in LaLiga also did a similar statement questioning to the arbitration, specifically the exert of Mario Melero López, the main judge of the crossing between Valencia CF and the Osasuna, when complaining of the fault of signaling of a penalti.

The hard criticism of the left side Spanish was the following: "it Seems that the VAR does not work in favour of Valencia. More than the VAR to me what calls me the attention is that in the rest approach to speak with the referee and he says us that if there was pitado the penalti the VAR would have removed it to him. We do not understand it, it has happened us in more than an occasion and seems that here it does not happen at all, is an action that changes the party. I do not want to put excuses, but are actions that repeat a lot and calls me the attention what says us the referee. It is the tonic that carry this season. Have to warn him of a penalti very clear. The referee has seen it and has not wanted to pitarlo. We will struggle against everything and will go on. Neither you can say at all why they take you out yellow as to me at the end. They do what want", concluded.

This was sufficient so that Gayá received a sanction of four parties, that although it was resorted in front of the competent organisms, there was not space for the appeal. Now it will be necessary to see which sucede in the possible stage in which it value if Vinicius Jr. It put or no in cloth of trial the work of the arbitration, in spite of not mentioning explicitly to the referee. In this sense, also exists the option that these statements happen unobserved for the Referee's Technical Committee, to the equal that in other occasions in which the '7' has attained to go out impune in front of possible sanctions.