Competition opens file to Pique by his statements on the referees

While Gerard Hammered recovers of his sguince of degree 3 in the internal lateral ligament and partial injury of the ligament crossed previous of the right knee, has received a bad news. The Committee of Competition has opened a file after some controversial statements of the central blaugrana, during an interview to DjMariio in 'Post United', in which it thought that it exists some favouritism by part of the referee's body Spanish with the Real Madrid.

"The past year, when reinicia LaLiga, the thing is that when we are badly are to hit us latigazos. The of LaLiga past of the Madrid is the more esperpéntico that have seen in my life. The party in San Sebastián, with four played doubtful and the four in favour of the Real Madrid. Some things that, with VAR, are totally injustificables. In Saint Mamés... You are accustomed to receive and when no you it pitan...", it said I Hammered in a talk with the Youtuber madridista.

"How they do not go to pitar in favour of the Madrid? Although it was inconscientemente, how do not go to throw more than an edict that of the another?"

However, the thickness of the statements of Gerard Hammered was in the fact that the culé said that an exárbitro, had said that 85% of the referee are followers of the RealMadrid. "How they do not go to pitar in favour of the Madrid? Although it was inconscientemente, how do not go to throw more than an edict that of the another?", atinó. Finally, the player of the FC Barcelona signalled that it respects the professionalism of the referees and "know that they try to do the best possible work, but when it arrives a moment of doubt...", it left in the air.

His words have not gone through unobserved and could have big consequences, considering that one of the rules of the Real Spanish Federation of Football (RFEF) is the respect to the referee's body. Competition understands that the words of the central Catalan attack against the honesty, professionalism and impartiality of the referee's community, reason by which could be sanctioned.

The possible sanction for Hammered

Considering the previous cases, Hammered would expose to the article 100 bis of the Disciplinary Code of the RFEF that affirms that "the realisation by part of any subject person to sportive discipline of statements through any half by means of which question the honesty and impartiality of any member of the referee's community or of the organs of the RFEF; as well as the statements that suppose a disapproval of the activity of any member of the communities mentioned when they effect with despise or when it employ an offensive language, insultante, humillante or malsonante".

In this sense, the sanction would be oriented to a suspension of four to twelve parties of suspension and fine in quantity of 601 to 3.005,06 euros, as it explains the article. Now, it will be necessary to expect to that the Committee of Competition indague in the case and in the weeks to come determine the 'punishment' of the culé, if it is that it fulfils with the requirements to be sanctioned.