Already it did long that it breathed an environment of tension between the directive of the FC Barcelona and the players. Something that began with the sportive management, aggravated with the dismissal of Ernesto Valverde, implosionó in front of the deal with players like Luis Suárez or Leo Messi and detonated in front of the new request of discount salarial after the wastes of the directive in cases like the 'Barçagate'.
The players sent two burofax to the Managerial Board, although they also wrote a letter that signed the four captains of the first team and the four of the filial to which had access the newspaper The World of the 21st century. In her, they exposed his posture in front of the negotiation to go down the wages, asking that they respect his rights and being very critical with the performance of the club in this appearance.
In the first place, the letter reports contradictions in the procedure. "The labour and sectorial rule -in reference to the RD 1006/1985- recognises our right to that the procedure develop of specific way in our community. We do not go to tolerate that the club conculque our rights with the arguments poured in his letter, that consider that the only way to obtain his aim is through conjoint actions of all the communities and sections of the club, when at the same time they recognise, going in in a clear contradiction, that any of said communities and sections already have made adjust them economic that pretend", began.
"We will not tolerate that the current situation serve of pretext to abuse of our rights"
Besides, the text lines of "bochornosa" the line of performance of the FC Barcelona. "It seems us very poor his answer that the RD 1006/1985 does not contain any disposal that limit the representativeness of the Committee of Company with regard to the community of subject workers to special labour relation, affirmation that do not argue in no way. It results us bochornoso that reflect by writing that our rights are guaranteeed, offering us the election of a representative of our community in a table of 13 members, so that, in reality, our capacity disuasoria is invalid", could read in the letter.
About the representativeness of the Committee of Company to defend his labour rights, the letter continued saying that "we have not appeared in any census of sindical elections neither have been constituents, so that the Committee of Company that exists in the club does not have our representation".
More critical against the directive arrived due to the fact that this had acted unilaterally, generating "unrest and deep disappointment that these manoeuvres of the leaders of the club, carentes of any legal backrest, are causing in our community, by what put of relief that ours only will is to impose unilaterally his decisions, ignoring any discordant opinion in this regard".
A staff joined
On the contrary of what published some media, the letter ensured that there was unit in the staff. "All the members of the staff are joined and are conscious of the situation caused by the pandemia, being the first in encouraging us for helping to our club, as we already have done, but in no case will tolerate that it serve of pretext to abuse of our rights", concluded.