Messi answers LaLiga and makes it clear that he has no termination clause

It had announced that this Friday Leo Messi went to pronounce at last and the Argentinian has not taken in doing it. The '10' has made a communiqué that has signed his father Jorge, in which it has directed directly to LaLiga. The representative of the captain of the FC Barcelona​ has wanted to leave very clear in this text that his son does not have clause of rescission, that is what affirmed from the patronal does some days.

"Desconocemos Which agreement is the one who have analysed and which are the bases on which conclude that the same agreement with a 'clause of rescission' applicable in case that the player decided to use the unilateral extinction of the same, with effects from the ending of the sportive season 2019/20", began saying the agent and father of the captain of the group barcelonista.

It is necessary to remember to the thread of this that LaLiga positioned in favour of the Barcelona does several days and signalled that the forward only could go out if it pays his clause, that would exist and would be of 700 million euros. "The agreement finds at present valid and has a 'clause of rescission' applicable to the supposed that Lionel Andrés Messi decided to urge the unilateral extinction anticipated of the same", commented, clearing that they would not give him the federative drop in case of not putting all this money in return.

This affirmation has bothered a lot in the surroundings of Leo and to the own player, that have decided to answer of conclusive form. In the communiqué explained that the interpretation of the patronal is wrong and so that it remained clear put the clause that appears in the agreement by which could go without paying. "This compensation will not apply when the resolution of the agreement by unilateral decision of the player have effects from the ending of the sportive season 2019-20", wrote.

To finalise, Jorge adds that there are other things of the agreement that links to the attacker with the Barça that the patronal omits. Besides, the father of the rosarino insists again in that by all the explained, the six times Balloon of Gold does not have to pay the 700 millions that demand if it leaves . "It is obvious that the compensation of 700 millions foreseen in the previous clause, is not applicable at all", finalised.